«Inversed» Sexual Dimorphism of the Upper Facial Width to Height Ratio in Buryats and Its Interpretation in Light of New Methodological Evidence

DOI: 10.33876/2311-0546/2025-1/353-368

Authors

Keywords:

sexual dimorphism, sex differences, facial shape, Buryats, facial width-to-height ratio, fWHR, population differences

Abstract

Population differences in sexual dimorphism of human facial shape are widely studied in modern scientific literature. One of the facial features that attracts the attention of researchers in the context of sexual differences, as well as mechanisms of sexual selection, is the upper facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR), measured as the ratio of the bizygomatic diameter to the upper height of the face. Until recently, sexual variability of fWHR was considered unidirectional (in men, the values are higher than in women), which was shown in numerous studies performed on modern living representatives of different racial groups. In a number of studies, significant sex differences in this trait were not found. Despite the wide coverage of populations studied to date throughout the world, indigenous groups of Siberia and the Russian Far East still remain virtually unstudied in terms of sexual variability of this facial trait. In one of the recent works, for the first time, the opposite direction of sex differences in fWHR was discovered in the Buryat population, in which women had higher values of the trait than men. In this work, fWHR was measured using photographs taken with standardized head position in the Frankfurt horizontal plane. This method of head positioning during photo shooting is almost never used in Western studies of fWHR. Instead, the natural head position is most often used. One of the recent methodological studies demonstrated that head positioning during photo shooting has a considerable effect on the two-dimensional projection of the facial shape in frontal perspective. Sex differences in shape are more pronounced when the head position is standardized in the Frankfurt horizontal plane. In the present work, we reproduced the results that revealed the opposite direction of sexual dimorphism in fWHR in Buryats on an independent sample of Buryats of the same age using head positioning both in the Frankfurt horizontal and in the natural position. The results confirmed the significant sexual dimorphism of fWHR in Buryats (women have higher fWHR than men) in both variants of head orientation. The methodological aspects associated with the definition of the fWHR are also discussed.

Author Biographies

  • Victoria Rostovtseva, the Russian Academy of Sciences N. N. Miklouho-Maklay Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology

    Rostovtseva, Victoria V. — Ph.D., Senior Research Scientist, the Russian Academy of Sciences N. N. Miklouho-Maklay Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology (Moscow, Russian Federation). E-mail: victoria.v.rostovtseva@gmail.com ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1846-9865

  • Marina Butovskaya, the Russian Academy of Sciences N. N. Miklouho-Maklay Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology

    Butovskaya, Marina L. — Corresponding Member RAS, Ph.D., Dr. Habil., Professor, Chief Researcher, the Russian Academy of Sciences N. N. Miklouho-Maklay Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology (Moscow, Russian Federation). E-mail: marina.butovskaya@gmail.com ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-0519

  • Anna Mezentseva, the Russian Academy of Sciences N. N. Miklouho-Maklay Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology

    Mezentseva, Anna A. — Ph.D., Researcher, the Russian Academy of Sciences N. N. Miklouho-Maklay Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology (Moscow, Russian Federation). E-mail: khatsenkova@yandex.ru ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6149-8971

  • Nadezhda Dashieva, the East Siberian State Institute of Culture

    Dashieva, Nadezhda B. — Ph.D., Dr. Habil., Professor, Head of the Research Laboratory of History and Theory of Culture, the East Siberian State Institute of Culture (Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation). E-mail: dashieva-n@yandex.ru ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3652-2535

    For citation: Rostovtseva, V. V., M. L. Butovskaya, A. A. Mezentseva, and N. B. Dashieva. 2025. «Inversed» Sexual Dimorphism of the Upper Facial Width to Height Ratio in Buryats and Its Interpretation in Light of New Methodological Evidence. Herald of Anthropology (Vestnik Antropologii) 1: 353-368.

    Funding: The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant №. 23-18-00277.

    References
    1. Alekseev, V. P., and G. F. Debets. 1964. Kraniometriia (metodika antropologicheskikh issledovanii [Craniometry (Methodology of Anthropological Research)]. Moscow: Nauka. 127 p.
    2. Baken, E., M. Collyer, A. Kaliontzopoulou, and D. Adams. 2021. Geomorph v4.0 and gmShiny: Enhanced Analytics and a New Graphical Interface for a Comprehensive Morphometric Experience. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 12: 2355–2363.
    3. Butovskaya, M. L., V. V. Rostovtseva, and A. A. Mezentseva. 2022. Facial and Body Sexual Dimorphism Are Not Interconnected in the Maasai. Journal of Physiological Anthropology 41(1): 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-021-00276-8
    4. Carré, J. M., and C. M. McCormick. 2008. In Your Face: Facial Metrics Predict Aggressive Behaviour in the Laboratory and in Varsity and Professional Hockey Players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275(1651): 2651–2656. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0873
    5. Cassi, D., C. De Biase, I. Tonni, M. Gandolfini, A. Di Blasio, et al. 2016. Natural Position of the Head: Review of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Methods of Recording. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 54(3): 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bjoms.2016.01.025
    6. Fiala, V., V. Třebický, F. Pazhoohi, J. D. Leongómez, P. Tureček, S. A. Saribay, R. M. Akoko, and K. Kleisner. 2021. Facial Attractiveness and Preference of Sexual Dimorphism: A Comparison Across Five Populations. Evolutionary Human Sciences 3: e38. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.33
    7. Geniole, S. N., A. E. Keyes, C.J. Mondloch, J. M. Carré, and C. M. McCormick. 2012. Facing Aggression: Cues Differ for Female Versus Male Faces. PloS One: 7(1): e30366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030366
    8. Geniole, S. N., T. F. Denson, B. J. Dixson, J. M. Carré, and C. M. McCormick. 2015. Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-To-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat. PloS One 10 (7): e0132726. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132726
    9. Geniole, S. N., and C. M. McCormick. 2015. Facing Our Ancestors: Judgements of Aggression Are Consistent and Related to the Facial Width-To-Height Ratio in Men Irrespective of Beards. Evolution and Human Behavior 36(4): 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.12.005
    10. Hodges-Simeon, C. R., G. Albert, G.B. Richardson, T. S. McHale, S. M. Weinberg, M. Gurven, and S. J. Gaulin, 2021. Was Facial Width-To-Height Ratio Subject to Sexual Selection Pressures? A Life Course Approach. PloS One 16(3): e0240284. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240284
    11. Houlton, T. M., N. Jooste, A. Uys, and M. Steyn. 2020. Lip Height Estimation in a Southern African Sample. South African Dental Journal 75(8): 415–424.
    12. Huh, H., D. Yi, and H. Zhu. 2014. Facial Width-To-Height Ratio and Celebrity Endorsements. Personality and Individual Differences 68: 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.044
    13. Kleisner, K., L. Priplatova, P. Frost, and J. Flegr. 2013. Trustworthy-looking Face Meets Brown Eyes. PloS One 8(1): e53285. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053285
    14. Kleisner, K., P. Tureček, S. C. Roberts, J. Havlíček, J. V. Valentova, R. M. Akoko, J. D. Leongómez, S. Apostol, M. A. Varella, and S. A. Saribay. 2021. How and Why Patterns of Sexual Dimorphism in Human Faces Vary Across the World. Scientific Reports 11(1): 5978. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41598-021-85402-3
    15. Kleisner, K., Š. Pokorný, and V. Černý. 2024. Sexually Dimorphic Traits Are Associated with Subsistence Strategy in African Faces from the Sahel/Savannah Belt. American Journal of Human Biology 36(4): e24008. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.24008
    16. Kollipara, R., B. Walker, and A. Sturgeon. 2017. Lip Measurements and Preferences in Asians and Hispanics: A Brief Review. The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology 10(11): 19–21.
    17. Kordsmeyer, T. L., D. Freund, S. R. Pita, J. Jünger, and L. Penke. 2019. Further Evidence that Facial Width-To-Height Ratio and Global Facial Masculinity Are Not Positively Associated with Testosterone Levels. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 5: 117–130.
    18. Kozlov, A., G. Vershubsky, and M. Kozlova. 2007. Indigenous Peoples of Northern Russia: Anthropology and Health. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 66 (sup1): 1–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2007.11864604B
    19. Kramer, R. S. 2017. Sexual Dimorphism of Facial Width-To-Height Ratio in Human Skulls and Faces: A Meta-Analytical Approach. Evolution and Human Behavior 38(3): 414–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.12.002
    20. Kramer, R. S., A. L. Jones, and R. Ward. 2012. A Lack of Sexual Dimorphism in Width-To-Height Ratio in White European Faces Using 2D Photographs, 3D Scans, And Anthropometry. PloS One 7 (8): e42705. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042705
    21. Lefevre, C. E., G. J. Lewis, T. C. Bates, M. Dzhelyova, V. Coetzee, I. J. Deary, and D. I. Perrett. 2012. No Evidence for Sexual Dimorphism of Facial Width-To-Height Ratio in Four Large Adult Samples. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(6): 623–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.03.002
    22. Lefevre, C. E., G. J. Lewis, D. I. Perrett, and L. Penke. 2013. Telling Facial Metrics: Facial Width Is Associated with Testosterone Levels in Men. Evolution and Human Behavior 34(4): 273–279.
    23. Mezentseva, A. A., V. V. Rostovtseva, and M. L. Butovskaya. 2024. Facial Cues to Physical Strength Are Not Always Associated with Facial Masculinity: Comparative Study of Europeans and Southern Siberians. American Journal of Human Biology 36(1): e23974. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23974
    24. Mezentseva, A. A., V. V. Rostovttseva, and M. L. Butovskaya. 2024. Analiz formy litsa vo frankfurtskoi gorizontali i estestvennom polozhenii golovy: metodicheskoe issledovanie [Facial Shape in the Frankfurt horizontal and Natural Head Position: A Methodological Study]. Vestnik Moskovskogo uiversiteta. Seriia XXIII. Antropologiia 2: 85–92.
    25. Mitteroecker, P., and P. Gunz. 2009. Advances in Geometric Morphometrics. Evolutionary Biology 36(2): 235–247.
    26. Robertson, J. M., and B. E. Kingsley. 2018. Sexually Dimorphic Faciometrics in Black Racial Groups from Early Adulthood to Late Middle Age. Evolutionary Psychology 16(4): 1474704918811056. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918811056
    27. Robertson, J. M., B. E. Kingsley, and G. C. Ford. 2017. Sexually Dimorphic Faciometrics in Humans from Early Adulthood to Late Middle Age: Dynamic, Declining, And Differentiated. Evolutionary Psychology 15(3): 1474704917730640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917730640
    28. Rohlf, F. J. 2015. The Tps Series of Software. Hystrix 26(1): 9–12. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-26.1-11264
    29. Roosenboom, J., K. Indencleef, M. K. Lee, H. Hoskens, J. D. White, D. Liu, J. T. Hecht, G. L. Wehby, L. M. Moreno, C. Hodges-Simeon, E. Feingold, M. L. Marazita, S. Richmond, M. D. Shriver, P. Claes, J. R. Shaffer, and S. M. Weinberg. 2018. SNPs Associated with Testosterone Levels Influence Human Facial Morphology. Frontiers in Genetics 9: 497. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00497
    30. Rostovtseva, V. V. 2021. Forma litsa sovmennykh buriat: Polovye razlichiia i sviazʹ s palʹtsevym indeksom [The Face Shape of the Tribal Buryats: Gender Differences and the Relationship with the Finger Index]. Ph.D. diss., Moscow State University.
    31. Rostovtseva, V. V., A. A. Mezentseva, S. Windhager, and M. L. Butovskaya. 2020. Second-tofourth Digit Ratio and Facial Shape in Buryats of Southern Siberia. Early Human Development 149: 105138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105138
    32. Rostovtseva, V. V., A. A. Mezentseva, S. Windhager, and M. L. Butovskaya. 2021. Sexual Dimorphism in Facial Shape of Modern Buryats of Southern Siberia. American Journal of Human Biology 33(2): e23458. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23458
    33. Rostovtseva, V. V., M. L. Butovskaya, A. A. Mezentseva, and F. J. Weissing. 2023. Effects of Sex and Sex-Related Facial Traits on Trust and Trustworthiness: An Experimental Study. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 925601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925601
    34. Stirrat, M., and D. I. Perrett. 2010. Valid Facial Cues to Cooperation and Trust: Male Facial Width and Trustworthiness. Psychological Science 21(3): 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362647
    35. Summersby, S., B. Harris, T. F. Denson, and D. White. 2022. Tracking Sexual Dimorphism of Facial Width-To-Height Ratio Across the Lifespan: Implications for Perceived Aggressiveness. Royal Society Open Science 9(5), 211500. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211500
    36. Tanikawa, C., E. Zere, and K. Takada. 2016. Sexual Dimorphism in the Facial Morphology of Adult Humans: A Three-Dimensional Analysis. Homo 67(1): 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2015.10.001
    37. Wen, G., and L. Zheng. 2020. Facial Width to Height Ratio Predicts Physical Aggression in Committed Relationships in Men and Dominance in Women in China. Personality and Individual Differences 157: 109832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109832
    38. Weston, E. M., A. E. Friday, R. A. Johnstone, and F. Schrenk. 2004. Wide Faces or Large Canines? The Attractive Versus the Aggressive Primate. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 271 (suppl_6): S416–S419. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0203
    39. Weston, E. M., A. E. Friday, and P. Liò. 2007. Biometric Evidence That Sexual Selection Has Shaped the Hominin Face. PloS One 2 (8): e710. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000710
    40. Zelditch, M., D. Swiderski, and H. D. Sheets. 2012. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. New York and London: Elsevier Academic Press. 437 p.

Downloads

Published

15.03.2025

Issue

No. 1 (2025): Вестник антропологии

Section

Physical anthropology