Students Interaction with Educational Everyday Artifacts as an Anthropological Practice

DOI: 10.33876/2311-0546/2025-2/44-66

Authors

Keywords:

Artifact, anthropological approach, educational environment, representation, history, educational everyday life

Abstract

Based on a study conducted in 2023/24, the article examines students’ interactions with artifacts of everyday educational life from the perspective of anthropological practices. In the era of digital content and virtual communication, it is most interesting to monitor the processes of interaction between teachers, students, and parents with objects and things of school life. Children's interest in artifacts is not accidental. At school, in a museum, in a home collection, they encounter artifacts of the historical, heroic or everyday past that “speak” to them in the language of an era. The school is a concentration of student artifacts from diplomas and cups, awards and medals to an old ruler, a wall newspaper from the 1980s or an inscription on the wall in the schoolyard. The everyday educational artifact is a material or abstract entity either created earlier and of historical value or created by the participants of an educational process at a moment of activity or event in the educational environment, capable of giving a certain experience, emotion, the impression that makes tradition come alive. Artifacts are always defined by the participants of educational relations as important, valuable, interesting, emotional, socially significant. In the course of our work, we studied the anthropological practices of interaction between students, administrators, and teachers with artifacts of everyday educational life in schools occupying both old, historical buildings with museum spaces and legends, and new ones without notable history. In the course of our work, we have identified different ways of interaction with artifacts of everyday educational life: through interaction with historical architecture and interiors, objects of museum collections, artifacts of educational everyday life in the classroom, the creation of pseudo-artifacts and symbols to maintain their own importance in the educational environment. It was found that high school students are better at building anthropological boundaries when interacting with artifacts than elementary school and 5th-6th grade students. Deeper social experience, the development of self-presentation and self-determination help them shape their history through the things and objects of school life, enriching the boundaries of anthropological experience with their values, intentions, interests and expectations.

Author Biographies

  • Elena Ivanova, Moscow City University

    Ivanova, Elena V. — Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Educational Infrastructures, the Research Institute of Urban Science  and Global Education Studies, Moscow City University (Russian Federation, Moscow). E-mail: ivanovaev@mgpu.ru ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4740-4235

  • Ekaterina Barsukova, Moscow City University

     

    Barsukova, Ekaterina M. — Researcher at the Laboratory of Educational Infrastructures, the Research Institute of Urban Science and Global Education Studies, Moscow City University (Russian Federation, Moscow). E-mail: barsukovaem@mgpu.ru ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3080-7967

  • Alexandra Iangurazova, Moscow City University

    Iangurazova, Alexandra O. — Junior Researcher at the Laboratory of Educational Infrastructures, Research Institute of Urban Science and Global Education Studies, Moscow City University. E-mail: blinovaAO@mgpu.ru ORCID ID:  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9917-0047

    For citation: Ivanova, E. V., E. M. Barsukova, and A. O. Iangurazova. 2025. Students Interaction with Educational Everyday Artifacts as an Anthropological Practice. Herald of Anthropology (Vestnik Antropologii) 2: 44–66.

    Funding: The research is funded by the Russian Science Foundation based on the results of the competition “Conducting fundamental scientific research and exploratory scientific research by small individual scientific groups (regional competition)” in 2022. Project No 23-28-10209.

    References

    Belov, E. A. 2014. Problema klassifikatsii kul'turnykh artefaktov [The Problem of Classification of Cultural Artifacts]. Vestnik Cheliabinskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii kul'tury i iskusstv 1: 43–46.

    Bezzubova, O. V. 2001. Muzei kak ob"ekt filosofsko-antropologicheskogo issledovaniia [Museum as an Object of Philosophical and Anthropological Research]. In Metodologiia gumanitarnogo znaniia v perspektive XXI veka. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii: k vos'midesiatiletiiu professora Moiseia Samoilovicha Kagana. Seriia “Symposium” [Methodology of Humanities in the Perspective of the 21st Century. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference: to the 80th Anniversary of Professor Moisei Samoilovich Kagan. Series “Symposium”]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel'stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 179–183.

    Bradley, J. M., and S. Pöyhönen. 2025. Walking with: Understandings and Negotiations of the Mundane in Research. Applied Linguistics Review: 16(1): 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2024-0069

    Brezack, N., M. Radovanovic, and A. L. Woodward. 2021. Everyday Interactions Support Toddlers’ Learning of Conventional Actions on Artifacts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 210: 105201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105201

    Flier, A. Ya. 2018. Algoritm interpretatsii kul'turnykh artefaktov v obrazovanii [Algorithm for Interpreting Cultural Artifacts in Education]. Kul'tura kul'tury 1: 13–20.

    Gurin, S. P. 2014. Praktiki sebia i praktiki drugogo [Practices of Yourself and Practices of Others]. Trudy Saratovskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi seminarii 8: 244–264.

    Hahn, H.-P. 2005. Materielle Kultur. Eine Einführung [Material Culture. An Introduction]. Berlin: Reimer Verlag. 206 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783496030287

    Ivanova, E. V., and A. E. Ter-Grigorian. 2023. Sokhranenie artefaktov uchebnoi povsednevnosti v protsesse renovatsii shkol'nykh zdanii [Preservation of Artifacts of Educational Everyday Life in the Process of Renovation of School Buildings]. In Obrazovanie i gorod: Tret'ia missiia universiteta. Resursy vzaimnogo razvitiia: Sbornik statei po itogam Piatogo i Shestogo ezhegodnykh mezhdunarodnykh simpoziumov. 2022–2023 [Education and the City: The Third Mission of the University. Resources for Mutual Development: Proceedings from the Fifth and Sixth Annual International Symposia. 2022–2023], ed. by S. N. Vachkova. Moscow: Obshchestvo s ogranichennoi otvetstvennost'iu "A-Prior". 127–142.

    Ivanova, E. V., E. M. Barsukova, A. O. Blinova, and A. E. Ter-Grigorian. 2024. Reprezentatsiia istorii shkoly cherez sokhranenie artefaktov uchebnoi povsednevnosti v protsesse renovatsii i stroitel'stva shkol'nykh zdanii [Schools History Representation Through the Preservation of Educational Everyday Life Artifacts Through the Process of Renovation and Construction of School Buildings]. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniia 2: 62–79. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.2.4

    Kairė, S. 2016. Significant Artifacts in Schools: Teacher and Pupil Perspectives. Journal of Education, Culture, and Society 7(2): 131–149. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20162.131.149  

    Kodzhaspirova, G. M. 2012. Pedagogicheskaia antropologiia kak otrasl' znaniia [Pedagogical Anthropology as a Branch of Knowledge]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriia “Pedagogika i psikhologiia” 4(22): 8–20.

    König, G. M. 2003. Auf dem Rücken der Dinge. Materielle Kultur und Kulturwissenschaft [On the Back of Things. Material Culture and Cultural Studies]. In Unterwelten der Kultur. Themen und Theorien der volkskundlichen Kulturwissenschaft [Underworlds of Culture: Topics and Theories of Folklore and Cultural Studies], ed. by K. Maase and B. J. Warneken. Köln: Böhlau Verlag. 95–118.

    König, G. M. 2012. Das Veto der Dinge. Zur Analyse materieller Kultur [The Veto of Things. For the Analysis of Material Culture]. In Die Materialität der Erziehung. Kulturelle und soziale Aspekte pädagogischer Objekte. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Beiheft [The Materiality of Education. Cultural and Social Aspects of Educational Objects. Journal of Education. Supplement], ed. by K. Priem, G. M. König, and R. Casale. Weinheim u.a.: Beltz. 14–31. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:7195

    Lomakina, I. S., and M. E. Duranov. 2005. Antropologicheskii podkhod i professional'naia podgotovka studentov [Anthropological Approach and Professional Training of Students]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia “Obrazovanie, zdravookhranenie, fizicheskaia kul'tura” 2(4): 52–55.

    Mörtsell, S. 2024. Lesson Enactments: Maintenance in Everyday Educational Practice. Postdigital Science and Education 6: 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00401-z

    Obukhov, A. S. (ed.), A. M. Fedoseeva, and A. Byford. 2018. Vvedenie v professiiu: psikholog obrazovaniia: uchebnik i praktikum dlia akademicheskogo bakalavriata. Seriia: Bakalavr. Akademicheskii kurs [Introduction to the Profession: Educational Psychologist: Textbook and Workshop for Undergraduate Studies. Series: Bachelor. Academic Course]. Moscow: Yurait. 391 p.

    Parker, B. D. 2016. Schools as Discriminatory Artifacts. Perspectives on Urban Education 13 (1): 76–80.

    Poliakov, S. D. 2011. Shkol'naia povsednevnost': eskiz peizazha [School Everyday Life: Landscape Sketch]. Narodnoe obrazovanie 5: 230–236.

    Poliakova, I. P. 2019. Povsednevnost' kak ob"ekt nauchnogo poznaniia [Everyday Life as an Object of Scientific Knowledge]. Filosofiia i kul'tura 2: 24–37. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0757.2019.2.29185

    Reh, S., and J. Scholz. 2012. Schülerzeitungen als Artefakte. Schulkulturen in den 1950er und 1960er Jahren [School Newspapers as Artifacts. School Cultures in the 1950s and 1960s]. In Die Materialität der Erziehung. Kulturelle und soziale Aspekte pädagogischer Objekte. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft [The Materiality of Education. Cultural and Social Aspects of Educational Objects. Journal of Education. Supplement], ed. by K. Priem, G. M. König, and R. Casale. Weinheim u.a.: Beltz. 105–123. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:7201

    Richardson, C., and P. Mishra. 2018. Learning Environments That Support Student Creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity 27: 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.004

    Robotova, A. S. 2016. Pochemu nuzhno izuchat' pedagogicheskuiu povsednevnost'? [Why is it Necessary to Study the Pedagogical Routine?]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii 4: 99–109.

    Rozhdestvenskaia, L. V. 2014. Artefakt-pedagogika: ot artefakta k uchebnoi situatsii [Artifact-Pedagogy: from Artifact to Learning Situation]. Povolzhskii pedagogicheskii vestnik 2(3): 25–29.

    Shvachko, E. V., and T. A. Kalugina. 2017. Sredovoi podkhod v metodologii pedagogicheskogo issledovaniia: soderzhatel'nyi i funktsional'nyi aspekty [Environmental Approach in Pedagogical Research Methodology: Content and Functional Aspects]. Vestnik "Өрлеу" — kst 3(17): 21–25.

    Silseth, K., and O. Erstad. 2022. Exploring Opportunities, Complexities, and Tensions when Invoking Students' Everyday Experiences as Resources in Educational Activities. Teaching and Teacher Education 112: 103633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103633

    Slobodchikov, V. I. 2011. Kontseptual'nye osnovy antropologii sovremennogo obrazovaniia [Conceptual Foundations of the Anthropology of Modern Education]. Innovatsionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii 3: 3–7.

    Voropaev, M. V. 2015. Problema predmetnoi opredelennosti povsednevnosti kak pedagogicheskogo fenomena [Everydayness as a Subject of Study in Pedagogy]. Sibirskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal 4: 178–185.

    Wartofsky, M. W. 1988. Modeli. Reprezentatsiia i nauchnoe ponimanie [Models. Representation and the Scientific Understanding]. Moscow: Progress. 507 p.

Published

08.06.2025