Tropical Trans-Saharan African Population Genesis: Craniological Aspect

DOI: 10.33876/2311-0546/2020-51-3/261-279

Authors

  • Aleksandr P. Pestriakov Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, RAS
  • Olga M. Grigorieva Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, RAS
  • Yulia V. Pelenitsyna Russian state Humanitarian University

Keywords:

craniology, craniotype, tropids, pygmies, trans-Saharan Africa

Abstract

This article continues a study of cranial growth on the example of the population of tropical Trans-Saharan Africa. The cranial samples of Gabon, basin of the Congo River (the Western part), and East African farmers and Capoids – Bushmen and Hottentots (the Eastern part) were analyzed. Male and female cranial samples were studied separately. Crania of some samples clustered according to the type of growth processes in the crania. Comparative analysis showed that the cranial samples (and clusters inside them) from the West of the studied region, as a whole, differ significantly from those from the East in the shape of the skull. This is clearly seen in the male sample, but less obvious in the female one. The overall size of the cranium in the West is significantly more variable than in the East. This is because of a Pygmy admixture in the population of equatorial rainforest, which are associated with a small size of the cranium. There is no such difference between East African farmers and the craniologically similar Capoids (Bushmen and Hottentots). This leads to two main conclusions. First, the population of the Western (humid) part of Equatorial Africa formed as a mixture of larger-headed agricultural groups with Pygmies, who had smaller crania. Second, the agricultural population of the Eastern (more arid) part of the studied territory is almost identical in craniological terms to the Capoids (Bushmen and Hottentots) of South Africa, while differs significantly from the pastoralist population of this territory.

References

  1. Alekseev, V.P., and G.F. Debets. 1964. Kraniometriia. Metodika antropologicheskikh issledovanii. [Craniometry. Methods of anthropological research]. Moscow: Nauka.
  2. Alexejev, V.P. 1973. Craniological material from new Guinea, Indonesia and the Malayan peninsula. Anthropologie XI/3: 201–248.
  3. Benington, R.C., Pearson K. 1912. A study of the Negro Skulls with special reference to the Congo and Gaboon. Crania. Biometrica 8 (¾): 292–339.
  4. Bunak, V.V. 1922. Osnovnye morfologicheskie cherty cherepa cheloveka i ikh evoliutsiia [Basic morphological features of the human skull and their evolution]. Russkii antropologicheskii zhurnal 12 (1–2): 24–52.
  5. Drontschilow, K. 1913. Metrische Studien an 93 Schadeln aus Kameru. A.f.A. XL: 161–183.
  6. Gorny, S. 1957. Crania Africana. Uganda. Wroclaw.
  7. Henneberg, M. and M. Steyn. 1993. Depart. of human Biology, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown 2193, and depfrt. of Anatomy , University Trends in Cranial Capacity and Cranial Index in Subsaharan Africa during the Holocene. American Journal of Human Biology 5: 473–479.
  8. Howells W.W. Craniometric data set. URL: http://web.utk.edu/ ~auerbach/HOWL.htm (Дата обращения 15.01.2020).
  9. Hrdlicka, 1928. A. Catalogue of human crania in the United States national museum collectilns. Procceedings of the of the United States national museum, Vol. 71. Washington.
  10. Kitson Elisabeth. 1931. A Study of the Negro Skull with Special Reference to the Crania from Kenya Colony. Biometrikа 23 (¾): 271–314.
  11. Oliver, R., Fegan B. 1986. Rozhdeniye bantuyazychnoy Afriki [The birth of Bantu-speaking Africa]. Iz istorii afrikanskogo srednevekovia. Stati britanskikh uchenykh, 77–147. Moscow: Nauka.
  12. Orlova, A.S., and E.S. Lvova. 1978. Stranitsy istorii velikoy savanny [Pages of the history of the great Savanna]. Moscow: Nauka. Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy literatury.
  13. Pestriakov, A.P. 1995. Rasy cheloveka v kraniologicheskoi klassifikatsii naseleniia tropicheskogo poiasa [Human races in the craniological classification of the tropical population]. In: Sovremennaia antropologiia i genetika i problema ras u cheloveka [Current anthropology and genetics and the issue of races and man], edited by I.M. 3olotareva, 43–90. Moscow: IEA RAN.
  14. Pestriakov, A.P., Grigor’eva O.M. 2004. Kraniologicheskaia differentsiatsiia sovremennogo naseleniia [The craniological differentiation of the contemporary population]. In: Rasy i narody. Ezhegodnik № 30 [Races and peoples: an annual edition no. 30], 86–131. Moscow: Nauka.
  15. Pestryakov, A.P., Grigoryeva O.M. 2013. Kraniotipy afrikanskogo kontinenta [Craniotypes of the African continent]. Vestnik antropologii 3 (25): 22–36.
  16. Pestryakov, A.P., Grigoryeva O.M. 2017. K tipologii rostovykh protsessov cherepnoy korobki cheloveka [On the typology of growth processes in the human cranium]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta XXIII. Antropologiya 1: 89–102.
  17. Ribot, I. 2003. Craniometrical analysis of Central and East Africansin relation to history. A case study based on unique collectionsof known ethnic affiliatio. Anthropologica et Preahistorica 114: 25–50.
  18. Righmire, G.P. 1970b. Bushman, Hottentot and South African Negro crania studied by distance and discrimination. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 33: 169–196.
  19. Roginskii, Ia.Ia., Levin M.G. 1973. Antropologiia [Anthropology]. Moscow: MGU.
  20. Shrubsall, F. С. 1922. A Note on Bushman Craniology. Man 22: 185–187.

Author Biographies

  • Aleksandr P. Pestriakov, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, RAS

    PhD in Hist., Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, RAS

  • Olga M. Grigorieva, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, RAS

    PhD in Hist., Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, RAS

  • Yulia V. Pelenitsyna, Russian state Humanitarian University

    student, Russian state Humanitarian University

Downloads

Published

02.02.2021

Issue

Section

Physical anthropology