“RASKOSETS”: FROM HOBBY TO COMMUNITY

DOI: 10.33876/2311-0546/2025-4/191-201

Authors

  • Ekaterina Andriushchenko University of Bologna

Keywords:

urban community, interest group, cultural practices, leisure, local communities, group identity, subculture

Abstract

Along with national projects to popularize traditional Russian culture, spontaneous independent communities arise around this interest. This article is based on two years of observations (2022–2024) of an amateur urban folklore ensemble in Moscow. Included observations and a series of in-depth interviews made it possible to trace the group's development, to answer the question of what this association means to the group, and to analyze folklore's real role within the group. The analysis identified signs of various community categories, such as an interest group or subculture, but none were confirmed as the main category. Performing folklore fosters communication within the group, and forming the community fulfills the city dwellers' need for security and acceptance more than maintaining their ethnicity.

Author Biography

  • Ekaterina Andriushchenko, University of Bologna

    Andriushchenko, Ekaterina Y. Master Student, University of Bologna. East European Studies (Bologna, Italy). E-mail: zapall@mail.ru

    For citation: Andriushchenko, E. Y.  2025. “Raskosec”: from Hobby to Community. Herald of Anthropology (Vestnik Antropologii) 4: 191–201.

    References

    Burani, P. 1901. Preface. In Dictionnaire français-argot et des locutions comiques [French Dictionary of Slang and Comic Expressions], by R. de Noter. Paris: Albert Mericant. P. 5–7.

    Cooley, Ch. H. 1929. Social Organization: A Study of the Larger Mind. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. 426 p.

    Durkheim, É. 1990. O razdelenii obshhestvennogo truda: Metod sotsiologii [The Division of Labour in Society]. Moscow: Nauka. 575 p.

    Goffman, E. 2000. Predstavlenie sebia drugim v povsednevnoi zhizni [The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life]. Moscow: Kanon-Press. 304 p.

    Likhachev, D. S. 1964. Argoticheskie slova professional’noi rechi [Argotic Words in Professional Speech]. In Razvitie grammatiki i leksiki sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Development of Grammar and Vocabulary of the Modern Russian Language], ed. by I. P. Muchnik and M. V. Panov. Moscow: Nauka. 311–359.

    Plamper, J. 2018. Istoriia emotsii [The History of Emotions]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 568 p.

    Poltorak, A. A. 2015. Vospriyatie slova “Khobbi” v sovremennykh russkom i angliiskom yazykakh [The Perception of the Word “Hobby” in Modern Russian and English Languages]. Science Time 3: 74–78.

    Reddy, W. M. 2001. The Navigation of Feeling: A Framework for the History of Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press. 380 p.

    Scheer, M. 2012. Are Emotions a Kind of Practice (and If So, Does That Make Them Have a History?): A Bourdieuian Approach to Understanding Emotions. History and Theory 51(2): 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00621.x  

    Shchepanskaya, T. B. 2024. Sistema: teksty i traditsii subkultury [System: Texts and Traditions of Subculture]. Moscow: OGI. 286 p.

    Vasilieva, N. A., and D. P. Betenkov. 2022. Kontsept Khobbi [The Concept of “Hobby”]. Yunyi uchenyi 7(59): 6–17. https://moluch.ru/young/archive/59/3149/

Published

14.12.2025

Issue

Section

The Anthropology of Performance