The Church at the End of Russia: Historical and Ethnographic Context of Building

10.33876/2311-0546/2024-4/173-189

Authors

Keywords:

Orthodox Church, temple construction, personality in history, votive church, motifs about miracles, identity, mythology

Abstract

The article is devoted to the ethnographic aspects of building a modern Orthodox church, the deeds and personality of its investor and constructor. This is the first time an Orthodox church is considered as a social and cultural object from the perspective of historical and anthropological methods, and the actions of its creator — as a response to the social and cultural requirements and demands of the modern era. The author considers the significance of the Church of the Intercession of the Holy Virgin in Kondratyevo as a symbol of ethnic and cultural local identity. The construction of a votive Orthodox church is a unique phenomenon in modern construction. Narratives about the construction of the Church of the Intercession, including motifs about miracles, which formed among the village church parish, eventually become a cultural text for the entire pan-Russian tradition. The personality and religiosity of the investor and the creator of the Church of the Intercession are considered. His personality is studied within the problem of "personality and history", "personality and individuality in culture". The author compares the process of building the Church to the spiritual perfection of its creator; his moral growth — to the construction of the church, and its construction itself is described as a spiritual process. The Church of the Intercession a church at the end of Russia nowadays fulfills protective and defensive functions as well as canonical ones due to its location at the state border. Its significance as a symbol of ethnic and cultural identity in the changing historical context is increasing.

Author Biography

  • Nataliya Мazalova, Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) of the Russian Academy of Sciences

    Мazalova, Nataliya E. Doctor of History, Senior Researcher, Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation). E-mail: mazalova.nataliya@mail.ru ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7586-4506

    For citation: Мazalova, N. E. 2024. The Church at the End of Russia: Historical and Ethnographic Context of Building. Herald of Anthropology (Vestnik Antropologii) 4: 173–189.

    References
    1. Antonova, M. V. 2015. Skazaniia ob osnovaniia monastyrei v regional’noi ustnoi i pis’mennoi traditsii: sistema motivov [Tales About the Founding of Monasteries in the Regional Oral and Written Tradition: The System of Motifs]. Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 6 (69): 89–91.
    2. Batalov, A. L. 2013. Obetnoe stroitel’stvo v Moskve “na rvu’ i v Pskove “na greble’: zakonomernosti sakral’noi topografii srednevekovogo goroda [Votive Construction in Moscow “on the Moat” and in Pskov “on the Row”: Patterns of Sacral Topography of the Medieval City]. Iskusstvoznanie 1–2: 10–37.
    3. Belomoeva, O. G. and T. V. Klimkina. 2018. Osobennosti razvitiia otechestvennoi kul’tovoi arkhitektury na rubezhe XX–XXI vv. (na primere Rossii i Mordovii) [Features of Development of Russian Religios Architecture at the Turn of the 21st Century (as for Russia and Mordovia)]. Finno-ugorskii mir 10(2): 98–108. https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.010.2018.02.098-108
    4. Bershtam, T. A. 2000. Molodost’ v simvolizme perehodnyh obrjadov vostochnyh slavjan. Uchenie i opyt Cerkvi v narodnom hristianstve [Youth in the Symbolism of Transitional Rites of the Eastern Slavs. Teachings and Experience of the Church in Folk Christianity]. Saint Petersburg: Petrburgskoie Vostokovedenije. 394 p.
    5. Bolshakova, N. V. 2014. Granitsa kak primeta prostranstva v dialektnom diskurse [Border as an Omen of Space in Dialect Discourse]. Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 5: 188–194.
    6. Dobrovolskaia, V. E. 1999. Neskazochnaia proza o razrushenii tserkvei [The Fabulous Prose about the Destruction of Churches]. Russkii fol’klor: Materialy i issledovaniia [Russian Folklore: Materials and Research], ed. by A. N. Rozov. Vol. 30. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. 500–512.
    7. Drannikova, N. V. 2020. Kul’turnaia pamiat’ zhitelei Arkhangel’ska o razrushenii i oskvernenii kul’tovykh sooruzhenii v sovetskii period [Cultural Memory of Arkhangelsk Residents about the Destruction and Desecration of Religious Buildings in the Soviet Period]. Uchenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo universiteta 42(6): 100–109. https://doi.org/10.15393/uchz.art.2020.522
    8. Galkova, I. G. 2015. Tserkvi i vsadniki. Romanskie khramy Puatu i ikh zakazchiki [Churches and Horsemen. Romanesque Temples of Poitou and Their Customers]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 400 р.
    9. Gura, A. V. 1997. Simvolika zhivotnykh v slavianskoi narodnoi traditsii [Animal Symbolism in Slavic Folk Tradition]. Moscow: Indrik. 911 p.
    10. Gurevich, A. Ya. 1990. Srednevekovyi kupets [Medieval Merchant]. In Odissei. Chelovek v istorii. Lichnost’ i obshchestvo [Odysseus. Man in History. Person and Society], ed. by A. Ya. Gurevich. Moscow: Nauka. 97–131.
    11. Igumen Aleksandr (A. N. Fedorov). 2007. Tserkovnoe iskusstvo kak prostranstvenno-izobrazitel’nyi kompleks [Church Art as a Spatial and Pictorial Complex]. Moscow: Satis”. 230 p.
    12. Kaariajnen, K. and D. Furman. 2000. Religioznost’ v Rossii v 90-e gg. [Religiosity in Russia in the 90s]. In Starye tserkvi, novye veruiushchie: religiia v massovom soznanii [Old Churches, New Believers: Religion in the Mass Consciousness], ed. by Kaariajnen, K. and D. Furman. Saint Petersburg; Moscow: Letnii sad. 7–48.
    13. Kesler, M. Yu. 2003. Pravoslavnaia khramovaia arkhitektura [Orthodox Temple Architecture]. Vol. 3. Moscow: Arkhitekturno-khudozhestvennyi tsentr Moskovskoi Patriarkhii “Arkhkhram”. 257 p.
    14. Lahteenmaki, M. 2012. The Making of a Barrier between Two Worlds: Finnicization of Finnish-Russian Border in the 1910s–20s. Eurasia Border Review 3(1): 33–50. http://srch.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/publictn/eurasia_border_review/ebr3/maria.pdf
    15. Likhachev, D. S. 1985. Gradozashchitnaia semantika Uspenskikh khramov na Rusi [Urban Semantics of the Uspensky Temples in Russia]. In Uspenskii sobor Moskovskogo Kremlia. Materialy i issledovaniia [Dormition Cathedral of the Moscow Kremlin. Materials and Research], ed. by E. S. Smirnova. Moscow: Nauka. 17–23.
    16. Mazalova, N. E. 2018. Vyborzhane: istoricheskaia pamiat’ i identichnost’ [Vyborg Residents: Historical Memory and Identity]. In Istoricheskaia pamiat’ i rossiiskaia identichnost’ [Historical Memory and Russian Identity], ed. by V. A. Tishkov and E. A. Pivneva. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo RAN. 397–407.
    17. Okunev, I. Yu. 2014. Rol’ interpretatsii prostranstva v formirovanii identichnosti (na primere rossiisko-evropeiskogo pogranich’ia) [The Role of Interpretation of Space in the Formation of Identity (On the Example of the Russian-European Borderland)]. In Kriticheskaia geopolitika [Critical Geopolitics], ed. by I. Yu. Okunev and S. O. Savin. Vol. 1. Noginsk: Analitica RODIS. 72–74.
    18. Paasi, A. 1996. Territories, Boundaries, and Consciousness: The changing Geographies of the Finnish-Russian Boundary. New York: Wiley. 353 p.
    19. Petrukhin, V. Ya. 2000. Drevniaia Rus’. Narod. Kniaz’ia. Religiia [Ancient Russia. People. Princes. Religion]. In Iz istorii russkoj kul’tury [From the History of Russian Culture], ed. by V. Ya. Petrukhin. Vol. 1. Moscow: Yazyki russkoi kul’tury. 13–413.
    20. Propp, V. Ya. 1986. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoi skazki [Historical Roots of the Magic Fairy tale]. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo LGU. 364 p.
    21. Riabova, L. K. 2015. K metodologii issledovaniia vospriiatiia gorodskogo prostranstva (sluchai Vyborga) [Toward a Methodology of Research on the Perception of Urban Space (The Case of Vyborg)]. Noveishaia istoriia Rossii 1: 110–121.
    22. Shchepanskaia, T. B. 2003. Kul’tura dorogi v russkoi miforitual’noi traditsii XIX–XX vv. [Culture of the Road in the Russian Mythoritual Tradition of the XIX–XX Centuries]. Moscow: Indrik. 526 p.
    23. Soloviev, A. K., and K. A. Soloviev. 2017. Sovremennaia kul’tovaia arkhitektura i aktual’nye problemy tserkovnogo iskusstva [Modern Architecture and Contemporary Problems of Religious Art]. Arkhitektura i sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii 1(38): 225–242.
    24. Tishkov, V. A., and E. A. Pivneva (eds.). 2018. Istoricheskaia pamiat’ i rossiiskaia identichnost’` [Historical Memory and Russian identity]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo RAN. 508 р.
    25. Tolstoi, N. I. 1996. Yazychestvo drevnikh slavian [Paganism of the Ancient Slavs]. In Ocherki istorii kul’tury slavian [Essays on the History of Slavic Culture], ed. by V. K. Volkov et al. Moscow: Indrik. 145–160.
    26. Ukraintseva, A. V. 2021. Sovremennaia pravoslavnaia tserkovnaia arkhitektura Rossii: problemy nauchnykh issledovanii [Modern Orthodox Church Architecture of Russia: problems of scientific research]. Urbanistika 2: 44–58. https://doi.org/10.7256/2310-8673.2021.2.31821
    27. Vinogradova, L. N. 2004. Granitsa kak osobaia prostranstvennaia kategoriia v narodnoi kul’ture [Border as a Special Spatial Category in Folk Culture]. In Kul’tura i prostranstvo. Slavyanskii mir [Culture and Space. Slavic World]. Moscow: Nauka. 29–28.

Published

22.12.2024

Issue

Section

Religion and Identity