THE AMBIVALENT INTEGRATION. THE ROLE OF NON-CONVENTIONAL MEDICINES IN THE ITALIAN NHS

Authors

  • Giarelli G.

Keywords:

non-conventional medicines, integrative medicine, integrated medicine, market-driven integration, state-driven integration, medical pluralism

Abstract

The problem of integration of alternative and complementary medicine (CAM) with biomedicine in contemporary health care systems has been quite debated during the last few years. We can identify two main models of strategic integration: the market-driven integration typical of the American health care system and the state-driven integration proper of the European, Canadian, and Australian health care systems. Whereas in the first model the medical-industrial complex (health insurances, private health care facilities, pharmaceuticals and health technologies industry) is the leading actor playing a substantive role in a demand-led process of integration where the market rationale is affecting all the other social actors involved (professions, citizens, researchers and the state), in the second case it is the state which plays a fundamental role in advancing the process that some scholars call of ‘mainstreaming’ of alternative medicine, with some contradictions.

In the Italian case, in fact, this role appear somewhat unclear, since it is strongly conditioned by the medical profession and its vested interests: since many years, a bill on regulation of alternative medicines is still on discussion in the Parliamentary Health Commission and its approval appears quite far away. In this national regulatory vacuum, some Regional Health Authorities (Piedmont,  Lombardy, Campania, Emilia-Romagna, Umbria and Tuscany) within the National Health Service (NHS) have started taking different measures in order to integrate some non-conventional medicines (in particular, homeopathy, herbal therapy and acupuncture) within their regional health systems, sometimes conflicting with the central government. Finally, the situation appears further complicated by the fact that, even though medical pluralism is not formally implemented in the Italian National Health Service yet, according to more recent surveys a growing number of citizens choose to treat themselves using some kind of non-conventional medicine. On the whole, the Italian case show a high degree of ambivalence between chances of an actual pluralistic integration and risks of co-optation of weakened forms of non-conventional medicines within the formal health care system.

References

  • Ananth, S. (2008), 2007 Health Forum Complementary and Alternative Medicine Survey Summary Report, Chicago: www.healthforum.com (accessed 9/15/2008).
  • Australian Government Department of Health and Aging (2004), Health and aged care. Promoting more coordinated care. On enhanced primary care: Building better care, Canberra.
  • Berman B.M. (2001), “Complementary medicine and medical education”, British Medical Journal, 322:121-12.
  • Bodeker, G. and Chaudury, R.R. (2001), “Lessons on integration from the developing world’s experience commentary: Challenges in using traditional systems of medicine”, British  Medical Journal, 322: 164-7.
  • Boon, H., M.J. Verhoef et al. (2004), ”From parallel practice to integrative healthcare: A conceptual framework”, BMC Health Services Research.
  • Brinkley R.D. e Simpson C.A. (2001), “An open access preferred provider organization model of
  • CAM delivery: Complementary Healthcare Plans”, in N. Fass (ed.) (2001), cit.: 343-349.
  • Cassileth B.R. et al. (2005), Integrative Oncology: Complementary therapies in cancer care, Hamilton: Decker.
  • Chez R.A., Jonas W.B. and D. Eisenberg (1999), “The physician and complementary and alternative medicine“, in Jonas W. B. and Levin S.J. (eds.), Essentials of complementary  and alternative medicine, cit.: 31-45.
  • Collyer, F. (2004), “The corporatisation and commercialisation of complementary and alternative medicine”, in Tovey P., Easthope G., Adams J. (eds.), The mainstreaming of complementary and alternative medicine: studies in social context, London: Routledge: 81-9.
  • Cuzzolin, L. and Benoni, G. (2009), “Attitudes and knowledge towardnatural products safety in the pharmacy setting: An Italian study”, Phytotherapy Research, 23, 7: 1018-23.
  • Fass N.J. (ed.) (2001), Integrating complementary medicine into health systems, Aspen Publ., Gaithersburg.
  • FNOMCeO (2002), Linee guida della FNOMCeO su medicine e pratiche non convenzionali, Delibera del 18 maggio, Terni.
  • Giarelli, G. (2005), Medicine non convenzionali e pluralismo sanitario. Prospettive e ambivalenze della medicina integrata, Milano: Franco Angeli.
  • Giarelli G. (2007), “La domanda di MNC in Italia: profili di prevalenza e modalità di utilizzo”, in Giarelli, Roberti di Sarsina e Silvestrini, cit.: 57-87.
  • Giarelli, G. Roberti di Sarsina, P. and B. Silvestrini (eds.) (2007), Le medicine non convenzionali in Italia. Storia, problemi e prospettive d’integrazione, Milano: Franco Angeli.
  • ISTAT (2007), Le terapie non convenzionali in Italia. Anno 2005, Roma: www.istat.it (accessed 6/01/2015).
  • Hollenberg, D. (2006), “Uncharted ground: Patterns of professional interaction among complementary/alternative and biomedical practitioners in integrative health care settings”, Social Science & Medicine, 62: 731-44.
  • Hollenberg,D. (2007), “How do private CAM therapies affect integrative health care settings in a publicly funded health care system?”, Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, 4: 1-16.
  • Jahnke R. (2001), “Health promotion and complementary medicine: Expanding the continuum of care”, in N. Fass (ed.), cit.:460-466.
  • Jonas W.B. and Levin S.J. (eds.) (1999), Essentials of complementary and alternative medicine, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Launso, L. (1989), “Integrated medicine: A challenge to the health care system“, Acta Sociologica, 32: 235-51.
  • Linde K. et al. (1996), “Randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for asthma. A systematic  review, Forsch Komplementärmed, 3: 148-55.
  • Maizes V., Rakel D. and C. Niemiec (2009), Integrative medicine and patient-centered care, Commission for the IOM Summit on Integrative Medicine and the Health of the Public, February.
  • Myklebust M., Pradhan E.K. and  D. Gorenflo (2008), “An integrative medicine patient care model and evaluation of its outcomes: The University of Michigan experience”, Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 14: 821-6.
  • NIH Panel on Definition and Description (1997), “Defining and describing complementary and alternative medicine”, Alternative Therapies, 3, 2: 49-57.
  • Ornish D. (1998), “Avoiding revascularization with lifestyle changes: The Multicenter Lifestyle Demonstration Project”, American Journal of Cardiology, 82 (10B): 72T-76T.
  • Peters D. et al. (2002), Integrating complementary therapies in primary care, Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone.
  • Rakel D. (a cura di) (2003), Integrative medicine, Philadelphia: Saunders.
  • Rees L. and Weil A. (2001),“Integrated medicine“, British Medical Journal, 322: 119-120.
  • Roberti di Sarsina P. e Iseppato, I. (2009), “Non-conventional medicine in Italy: The present situation”, European Journal of Integrative Medicine,
  • Roberti di Sarsina P. (2005), Consensus Document on NCM/CAM in Italy, Evidence Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2: 233-5.
  • Scherwitz L. et al. (2003), “An integrative medicine clinic in a community hospital”, American Journal of Public Health, 93, 4:549-52.
  • Scherwitz L. et al. (2004), “A descriptive analysis of an integrative medicine clinic”, Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 10: 651-9.
  • Shuval, J., Aerbuch T. (2012), “Complementary and alternative health care in Israel”,  Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 1: 7-19.
  • Stepan, J. (1983), “Patterns of legislation concerning Traditional Medicine”, in Bannerman R.H.,
  • Burton J and C. Wen Chieh (eds.), Traditional Medicine and health care coverage: A reader for health administrators and practitioners, Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • Sundenberg, T. et al. (2007), Towards a model for integrative medicine in Swedish primary care, BMC Health Service Research, 7: 1-9.
  • Tacchino, C. and Tanzi, E. (2006), “Le medicine e le terapie non convenzionali nelle politiche e nelle esperienze del sistema sanitario”, Mecosan, 58: 71-98.
  • Templeman K. and A. Robinson (2011), “Integrative medicine models in contemporary primary health care”, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 19: 84-92.
  • Weil, A. (2003), “Foreword”, in Rakel, cit.: xiii.
  • WHO (2002), Traditional Medicine strategy:2002-2005, Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • WHO (2004), WHO Guidelines on developing consumer information on proper use of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine, Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • The article is available in full versio in Russian

Published

2021-02-09

Issue

Section

SCIENCE / Articles